<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1549 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171521</link>
    <description>Buyer control over the seller&#039;s production, pricing, product design, research and development, supervision, and purchase of the entire output brought the parties within the concept of inter-connected undertakings and therefore related persons for excise valuation. On that basis, the declared sale price could not stand alone where it excluded identifiable additional consideration such as tools, dies, moulds, drawings, design work, research and development, and supervisory assistance supplied by the buyer. Because the value of those components had not been quantified on the existing record, the assessable value had to be re-determined under the valuation rules and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1549 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171521</link>
      <description>Buyer control over the seller&#039;s production, pricing, product design, research and development, supervision, and purchase of the entire output brought the parties within the concept of inter-connected undertakings and therefore related persons for excise valuation. On that basis, the declared sale price could not stand alone where it excluded identifiable additional consideration such as tools, dies, moulds, drawings, design work, research and development, and supervisory assistance supplied by the buyer. Because the value of those components had not been quantified on the existing record, the assessable value had to be re-determined under the valuation rules and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>