<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 784 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261823</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, holding that the excise duty refund claimed should be treated as a capital receipt reducing the project cost. The Court clarified the correct provision under the Income Tax Act and emphasized that such refunds are related to capital assets, aligning with established legal principles. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 784 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261823</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, holding that the excise duty refund claimed should be treated as a capital receipt reducing the project cost. The Court clarified the correct provision under the Income Tax Act and emphasized that such refunds are related to capital assets, aligning with established legal principles. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>