<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 767 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of both assessees for statistical purposes, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities. It directed the assessing officers to reconsider the issues based on any additional material submitted by the assessees. The judgment emphasized deciding appeals on merit, regardless of representation, to prevent assessees from being penalized for counsel negligence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:48:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 767 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of both assessees for statistical purposes, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities. It directed the assessing officers to reconsider the issues based on any additional material submitted by the assessees. The judgment emphasized deciding appeals on merit, regardless of representation, to prevent assessees from being penalized for counsel negligence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>