https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171515 The appellants were convicted under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of TADA for opening fire at the victim's house. The confessional statements were deemed voluntary, and the prosecution case was upheld by the Designated Court, leading to the conviction of the accused. Despite challenges regarding compliance with TADA Rules and examination procedures, the court found the evidence credible, including the deposition of an interested witness. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction, and the appellant not on bail was ordered into custody to serve the sentence. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:44:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171515 The appellants were convicted under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of TADA for opening fire at the victim's house. The confessional statements were deemed voluntary, and the prosecution case was upheld by the Designated Court, leading to the conviction of the accused. Despite challenges regarding compliance with TADA Rules and examination procedures, the court found the evidence credible, including the deposition of an interested witness. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction, and the appellant not on bail was ordered into custody to serve the sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171515