https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171515 A confession recorded under TADA was treated as valid where it was forwarded directly to the designated court, because the intermediate transmission through the Chief Judicial Magistrate was held to be a directory safeguard and no prejudice or tampering was shown. Omission to ask a separate Section 313 CrPC question on the confessional statements did not vitiate the trial, since the substance of the incriminating material had been put to the accused and an effective opportunity to was given. Conviction was sustained on the basis of an injured witness's reliable testimony, corroborated in material particulars by proved confessions, with the challenge of fabrication and lack of corroboration rejected. en-us Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:44:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171515 A confession recorded under TADA was treated as valid where it was forwarded directly to the designated court, because the intermediate transmission through the Chief Judicial Magistrate was held to be a directory safeguard and no prejudice or tampering was shown. Omission to ask a separate Section 313 CrPC question on the confessional statements did not vitiate the trial, since the substance of the incriminating material had been put to the accused and an effective opportunity to was given. Conviction was sustained on the basis of an injured witness's reliable testimony, corroborated in material particulars by proved confessions, with the challenge of fabrication and lack of corroboration rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171515