https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171514 The Supreme Court convicted accused A3 for extortion, sentencing him to two years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. Accused A5 and A6 were convicted for murder and related offenses, receiving life imprisonment. The court upheld the acquittal of A1 and A2, emphasizing the absence of direct evidence linking them to the murder conspiracy. The confessional statements of A5 and A6 were deemed admissible, supported by corroborative evidence like weapon recovery and witness testimonies. The court modified the trial court's judgment, convicting A3, A5, and A6 while maintaining the acquittal of A1 and A2. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:14:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171514 The Supreme Court convicted accused A3 for extortion, sentencing him to two years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. Accused A5 and A6 were convicted for murder and related offenses, receiving life imprisonment. The court upheld the acquittal of A1 and A2, emphasizing the absence of direct evidence linking them to the murder conspiracy. The confessional statements of A5 and A6 were deemed admissible, supported by corroborative evidence like weapon recovery and witness testimonies. The court modified the trial court's judgment, convicting A3, A5, and A6 while maintaining the acquittal of A1 and A2. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171514