<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 885 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171490</link>
    <description>Offences under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 were treated as bailable, and an arrested person offering bail was entitled to release under Section 104(3) if not wanted in connection with any other offence. The Court also noted that the IPC offences relied upon were bailable and that the accused had remained in custody since 15-10-2010. Bail was therefore granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:01:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 885 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171490</link>
      <description>Offences under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 were treated as bailable, and an arrested person offering bail was entitled to release under Section 104(3) if not wanted in connection with any other offence. The Court also noted that the IPC offences relied upon were bailable and that the accused had remained in custody since 15-10-2010. Bail was therefore granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>