<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 743 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171493</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal in M.P. No. 1 of 2013 and C.M.A. SR. No. 85936 of 2012 due to the Revenue&#039;s significant delay of 3053 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. Despite the attempt to explain the delay through exchanged letters between officials, the court found the explanations unsatisfactory and unjustifiable. Consequently, the court declined to condone the delay, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without imposing any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:50:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 743 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171493</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal in M.P. No. 1 of 2013 and C.M.A. SR. No. 85936 of 2012 due to the Revenue&#039;s significant delay of 3053 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. Despite the attempt to explain the delay through exchanged letters between officials, the court found the explanations unsatisfactory and unjustifiable. Consequently, the court declined to condone the delay, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without imposing any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>