<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 988 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171504</link>
    <description>The customs appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after the appellant Department failed to appear when the matter was taken up, despite an earlier adjournment at the parties&#039; request. The Court treated the repeated non-appearance as showing no interest in pursuing the appeal and brought the proceedings to an end without examining the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:15:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 988 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171504</link>
      <description>The customs appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution after the appellant Department failed to appear when the matter was taken up, despite an earlier adjournment at the parties&#039; request. The Court treated the repeated non-appearance as showing no interest in pursuing the appeal and brought the proceedings to an end without examining the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>