https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261792 The Court referred a case involving a challenge to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing an extension of stay beyond 365 days to a larger Bench due to conflicting judgments. The Court cited a conflict between the rulings in Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. and Pepsi Foods cases regarding the extension of stay provisions under the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for stay in the present case and directed the matter to be placed before a larger Bench for clarification on the interpretation of the provisions related to extending stay beyond 365 days before the CESTAT. en-us Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261792 The Court referred a case involving a challenge to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing an extension of stay beyond 365 days to a larger Bench due to conflicting judgments. The Court cited a conflict between the rulings in Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. and Pepsi Foods cases regarding the extension of stay provisions under the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for stay in the present case and directed the matter to be placed before a larger Bench for clarification on the interpretation of the provisions related to extending stay beyond 365 days before the CESTAT. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261792