https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261790 The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the challenged order by the Settlement Commission, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner, a manufacturer under the Central Excise Act, was granted two weeks to submit remarks on the investigation report. The Court emphasized the importance of furnishing investigation reports in advance to ensure the opportunity for the party to contest findings and upheld that cooperation in settlement context requires full and truthful disclosure by the assessee. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261790 The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the challenged order by the Settlement Commission, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The petitioner, a manufacturer under the Central Excise Act, was granted two weeks to submit remarks on the investigation report. The Court emphasized the importance of furnishing investigation reports in advance to ensure the opportunity for the party to contest findings and upheld that cooperation in settlement context requires full and truthful disclosure by the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261790