https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261789 The High Court set aside the judgment dismissing a writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction under Article 226. The appeal successfully argued that even a fraction of the cause of action within the High Court's jurisdiction is sufficient. Emphasizing the importance of the situs of the cause of action, the High Court restored the writ petition for further consideration by a judge with appropriate jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed without costs, highlighting the significance of territorial cause of action in determining the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226. en-us Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jan 2016 15:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261789 The High Court set aside the judgment dismissing a writ petition due to lack of territorial jurisdiction under Article 226. The appeal successfully argued that even a fraction of the cause of action within the High Court's jurisdiction is sufficient. Emphasizing the importance of the situs of the cause of action, the High Court restored the writ petition for further consideration by a judge with appropriate jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed without costs, highlighting the significance of territorial cause of action in determining the High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261789