<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 749 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261788</link>
    <description>Preventive detention remains sustainable where the detention order and grounds, read together, show conscious application of mind to relevant material, including attempted foreign-currency smuggling, seizure records, statutory statements and prior similar conduct. Earlier incidents may reinforce the preventive need to stop future smuggling, without creating a fatal variance between subjective satisfaction and the detention grounds. The detenu&#039;s constitutional right to an effective representation is preserved where supplied documents disclose the relevant facts; non-supply of further particulars does not invalidate detention when no meaningful opportunity is denied. The detention order was upheld and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 749 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261788</link>
      <description>Preventive detention remains sustainable where the detention order and grounds, read together, show conscious application of mind to relevant material, including attempted foreign-currency smuggling, seizure records, statutory statements and prior similar conduct. Earlier incidents may reinforce the preventive need to stop future smuggling, without creating a fatal variance between subjective satisfaction and the detention grounds. The detenu&#039;s constitutional right to an effective representation is preserved where supplied documents disclose the relevant facts; non-supply of further particulars does not invalidate detention when no meaningful opportunity is denied. The detention order was upheld and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>