https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261788 The court upheld the validity of the detention order under COFEPOSA, finding that the detaining authority had applied its mind properly. It determined that there was no variance between the subjective satisfaction and the grounds of detention. The detenu's right to make an effective representation was deemed not violated as he was provided with the required documents. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and the rule discharged. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 16:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261788 The court upheld the validity of the detention order under COFEPOSA, finding that the detaining authority had applied its mind properly. It determined that there was no variance between the subjective satisfaction and the grounds of detention. The detenu's right to make an effective representation was deemed not violated as he was provided with the required documents. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and the rule discharged. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261788