<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 738 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261777</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80P(2)(d) was upheld where the Assessing Officer had only considered whether gross or net income should be taken for the claim. The Tribunal accepted the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; reliance on binding coordinate bench decisions and held that the Revenue could not raise a new objection before it on a ground not examined by the Assessing Officer. The assessee&#039;s deduction claim was therefore sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 738 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261777</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80P(2)(d) was upheld where the Assessing Officer had only considered whether gross or net income should be taken for the claim. The Tribunal accepted the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; reliance on binding coordinate bench decisions and held that the Revenue could not raise a new objection before it on a ground not examined by the Assessing Officer. The assessee&#039;s deduction claim was therefore sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>