<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 860 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171489</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court&#039;s decision that the Chairman of the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) lacked jurisdiction under Regulation 51 to issue instructions impacting gratuity payments. The Court emphasized that gratuity calculations should be based on the last drawn salary as per Regulation 77, distinct from pay revisions governed by Regulation 51. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded and counsel&#039;s fee set at Rs. 25,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 860 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171489</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court&#039;s decision that the Chairman of the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) lacked jurisdiction under Regulation 51 to issue instructions impacting gratuity payments. The Court emphasized that gratuity calculations should be based on the last drawn salary as per Regulation 77, distinct from pay revisions governed by Regulation 51. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded and counsel&#039;s fee set at Rs. 25,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>