<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 627 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171486</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging a reassessment order directing tax payment due to non-compliance with conditions for tax exemption under section 8(5) of the CST Act. Emphasizing the prospective nature of the provision, the court held that failure to produce form C rendered the petitioner ineligible for the exemption. The decision upheld the assessing authority&#039;s actions, emphasizing the necessity of meeting statutory requirements for tax benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 627 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171486</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging a reassessment order directing tax payment due to non-compliance with conditions for tax exemption under section 8(5) of the CST Act. Emphasizing the prospective nature of the provision, the court held that failure to produce form C rendered the petitioner ineligible for the exemption. The decision upheld the assessing authority&#039;s actions, emphasizing the necessity of meeting statutory requirements for tax benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>