<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 627 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171486</link>
    <description>The claimed benefit under section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act is described as prospective and conditional, not an indefeasible right. Its availability depends on compliance with the statutory requirements attached to the provision, including production of Form C. Where Form C is not produced, an assessment granting the exemption cannot be sustained, and the revisional authority may correct the error. The reassessment order was therefore upheld on the stated facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 627 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171486</link>
      <description>The claimed benefit under section 8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act is described as prospective and conditional, not an indefeasible right. Its availability depends on compliance with the statutory requirements attached to the provision, including production of Form C. Where Form C is not produced, an assessment granting the exemption cannot be sustained, and the revisional authority may correct the error. The reassessment order was therefore upheld on the stated facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>