https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171484 The appellant was convicted for the double murder of his mother and infant son, along with theft of jewelry. Motivated by financial gain, he brutally murdered them after being denied money. Circumstantial evidence, including possession of stolen jewelry and attempts to sell it, supported the prosecution's case. Despite attempts to explain the possession, the appellant's guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the convictions for double murder and theft. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:52:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171484 The appellant was convicted for the double murder of his mother and infant son, along with theft of jewelry. Motivated by financial gain, he brutally murdered them after being denied money. Circumstantial evidence, including possession of stolen jewelry and attempts to sell it, supported the prosecution's case. Despite attempts to explain the possession, the appellant's guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the convictions for double murder and theft. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jul 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171484