https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261759 The Delhi HC set aside a CESTAT order extending an interim order for a respondent assessee, citing a provision limiting such extensions under the Income Tax Act. The impugned order was not sustained, but the Revenue was restrained from coercive action for four weeks to allow the respondent to seek relief under Article 226 of the Constitution if necessary. en-us Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2015 11:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261759 The Delhi HC set aside a CESTAT order extending an interim order for a respondent assessee, citing a provision limiting such extensions under the Income Tax Act. The impugned order was not sustained, but the Revenue was restrained from coercive action for four weeks to allow the respondent to seek relief under Article 226 of the Constitution if necessary. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261759