<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 602 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171478</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and upholding the Labour Court&#039;s decision with modifications. It directed the reinstatement of the workman with 60% back wages from 8.12.1981 to 16.4.1986 and full back wages thereafter until reinstatement. The Court emphasized the social welfare objectives of the Industrial Disputes Act and rejected the applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation Act to proceedings under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 602 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171478</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and upholding the Labour Court&#039;s decision with modifications. It directed the reinstatement of the workman with 60% back wages from 8.12.1981 to 16.4.1986 and full back wages thereafter until reinstatement. The Court emphasized the social welfare objectives of the Industrial Disputes Act and rejected the applicability of Article 137 of the Limitation Act to proceedings under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>