<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (11) TMI 64 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171477</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal by the Customs authorities and upheld the decision to quash the penalty imposed on the respondent. It was concluded that the respondent was not involved in the importation of gold under Section 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act. Despite the failure of the appeal, the Court declined to award costs to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:00:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (11) TMI 64 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171477</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal by the Customs authorities and upheld the decision to quash the penalty imposed on the respondent. It was concluded that the respondent was not involved in the importation of gold under Section 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act. Despite the failure of the appeal, the Court declined to award costs to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>