<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 687 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), BANGALORE-I</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171473</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s. Maini Precision Private Limited against an Order-in-Original for non-payment of service tax on facilitation cost reimbursement was successful. The Commissioner found that the facilitation charges were for providing facilities to the joint venture unit and not for Management Consultancy services as alleged by the department. The demand for service tax under Section 68 was deemed fatal, and it was emphasized that such demands should be raised under Section 73. Consequently, the Order-in-Original was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief in favor of M/s. Maini Precision Private Limited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:26:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 687 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), BANGALORE-I</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171473</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s. Maini Precision Private Limited against an Order-in-Original for non-payment of service tax on facilitation cost reimbursement was successful. The Commissioner found that the facilitation charges were for providing facilities to the joint venture unit and not for Management Consultancy services as alleged by the department. The demand for service tax under Section 68 was deemed fatal, and it was emphasized that such demands should be raised under Section 73. Consequently, the Order-in-Original was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief in favor of M/s. Maini Precision Private Limited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>