<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 897 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171468</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the detention orders for the petitioners, Diwakar Gupta and Amit Kohli, at the pre-execution stage, following a precedent where similar detention orders were deemed illegal. The court emphasized that if a detention order is clearly illegal, the individual should not be compelled to go to jail. The court also addressed concerns regarding the petitioners obtaining the detention orders before being served, leaving further investigation to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 897 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171468</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the detention orders for the petitioners, Diwakar Gupta and Amit Kohli, at the pre-execution stage, following a precedent where similar detention orders were deemed illegal. The court emphasized that if a detention order is clearly illegal, the individual should not be compelled to go to jail. The court also addressed concerns regarding the petitioners obtaining the detention orders before being served, leaving further investigation to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>