<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 897 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171468</link>
    <description>Pre-execution detention under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act was treated as unenforceable where the alleged trade in the specified psychotropic substances had already been held, in identical co-accused matters, not to amount to illicit traffic. The Court applied the principle that a clearly illegal detention order need not be allowed to operate merely because execution has not begun, and accepted the pre-execution challenge as maintainable on that basis. The detention orders were quashed and given no effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 897 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171468</link>
      <description>Pre-execution detention under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act was treated as unenforceable where the alleged trade in the specified psychotropic substances had already been held, in identical co-accused matters, not to amount to illicit traffic. The Court applied the principle that a clearly illegal detention order need not be allowed to operate merely because execution has not begun, and accepted the pre-execution challenge as maintainable on that basis. The detention orders were quashed and given no effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>