https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171467 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the civil court had jurisdiction to hear a suit arising from a disciplinary proceeding by a Cane Growers' Cooperative Society against its employee. It was determined that the dispute did not fall under the compulsory arbitration provision of Rule 115 of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Rules, 1936, as it did not touch the business of the society. The Court clarified that the U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchases) Act, 1953, does not override the jurisdictional provisions of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1912. The appeal was dismissed, and the case was remanded for prompt adjudication by the district judge. en-us Wed, 27 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:09:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171467 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the civil court had jurisdiction to hear a suit arising from a disciplinary proceeding by a Cane Growers' Cooperative Society against its employee. It was determined that the dispute did not fall under the compulsory arbitration provision of Rule 115 of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Rules, 1936, as it did not touch the business of the society. The Court clarified that the U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchases) Act, 1953, does not override the jurisdictional provisions of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1912. The appeal was dismissed, and the case was remanded for prompt adjudication by the district judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Aug 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171467