https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171466 The Delhi High Court held that it had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition based on the issuance of the detention order and grounds of detention within its jurisdiction. Regarding the legality of the detention order, the court found that the non-placement and non-consideration of a relevant document rendered the order illegal, and its relevance was lost due to the passage of time. The court concluded that the detention order was stale and directed its cancellation, allowing the writ petition at the pre-execution stage, with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171466 The Delhi High Court held that it had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition based on the issuance of the detention order and grounds of detention within its jurisdiction. Regarding the legality of the detention order, the court found that the non-placement and non-consideration of a relevant document rendered the order illegal, and its relevance was lost due to the passage of time. The court concluded that the detention order was stale and directed its cancellation, allowing the writ petition at the pre-execution stage, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171466