https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171466 Article 226 allows territorial jurisdiction where the detention order-making process forms part of the cause of action, so a challenge to a preventive detention order can be entertained if the making of the order and grounds occurred within the court's reach. Pre-execution review is not confined to rigidly closed categories; the recognised grounds are illustrative, and a writ may be examined before service where judicial review is otherwise justified. A detention order must retain a live and subsisting nexus with preventive purpose; here, long delay, lack of any intervening prejudicial activity, and absence of current necessity made the order stale and unenforceable. en-us Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171466 Article 226 allows territorial jurisdiction where the detention order-making process forms part of the cause of action, so a challenge to a preventive detention order can be entertained if the making of the order and grounds occurred within the court's reach. Pre-execution review is not confined to rigidly closed categories; the recognised grounds are illustrative, and a writ may be examined before service where judicial review is otherwise justified. A detention order must retain a live and subsisting nexus with preventive purpose; here, long delay, lack of any intervening prejudicial activity, and absence of current necessity made the order stale and unenforceable. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171466