<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1192 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171438</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose a general penalty under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, due to a duty payment delay, despite the initial notice being issued under Rule 25. The Court found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, stating that no illegality or breach of statutory provision was proven. As there was no demonstration of prejudice or illegality in the penalty imposition, the Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that no question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1192 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171438</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to impose a general penalty under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, due to a duty payment delay, despite the initial notice being issued under Rule 25. The Court found no error in the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, stating that no illegality or breach of statutory provision was proven. As there was no demonstration of prejudice or illegality in the penalty imposition, the Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that no question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>