<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1190 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171436</link>
    <description>The Court held that the respondent was liable for penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for distributing gift boxes without paying duty in 1994, 1995, and 1996. Despite paying duty in 1997, the Court found the penalty applicable for non-payment before the show-cause notice in 1998. The Court set aside CESTAT&#039;s decision on penalty, allowing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal without costs and closing the related Miscellaneous Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:56:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1190 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171436</link>
      <description>The Court held that the respondent was liable for penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for distributing gift boxes without paying duty in 1994, 1995, and 1996. Despite paying duty in 1997, the Court found the penalty applicable for non-payment before the show-cause notice in 1998. The Court set aside CESTAT&#039;s decision on penalty, allowing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal without costs and closing the related Miscellaneous Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>