<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 983 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171447</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras addressed an appeal filed by the Revenue against the Final Order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, raising substantial questions of law. The Court noted the stake involved was Rs. 33,819 and decided not to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s order, refraining from expressing opinions on the legal questions. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the High Court emphasized that in cases with minimal stakes, intervention may not be necessary, leaving legal questions for future consideration in more suitable circumstances. The appeal was disposed of without costs, emphasizing the importance of considering stake magnitude in judicial intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:20:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 983 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171447</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras addressed an appeal filed by the Revenue against the Final Order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, raising substantial questions of law. The Court noted the stake involved was Rs. 33,819 and decided not to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s order, refraining from expressing opinions on the legal questions. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the High Court emphasized that in cases with minimal stakes, intervention may not be necessary, leaving legal questions for future consideration in more suitable circumstances. The appeal was disposed of without costs, emphasizing the importance of considering stake magnitude in judicial intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>