<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1050 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171444</link>
    <description>The High Court intervened in a case challenging a stay order directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 40 lacs under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court directed the petitioner to initially deposit Rs. 10 lacs, with an additional Rs. 15 lacs required for the appeal hearing by the Tribunal, totaling Rs. 25 lacs. The Court granted an extension for the petitioner to fulfill the additional deposit by a specified deadline to proceed with the appeal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:02:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1050 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171444</link>
      <description>The High Court intervened in a case challenging a stay order directing a pre-deposit of Rs. 40 lacs under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court directed the petitioner to initially deposit Rs. 10 lacs, with an additional Rs. 15 lacs required for the appeal hearing by the Tribunal, totaling Rs. 25 lacs. The Court granted an extension for the petitioner to fulfill the additional deposit by a specified deadline to proceed with the appeal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>