https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171442 The High Court of Madhya Pradesh held that a writ petition was not maintainable when a statutory remedy was available to the petitioner through the Central Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the court emphasized the need to exhaust statutory remedies before approaching the court directly. The petitioner was directed to challenge the action before the Appellate Tribunal within 30 days. The High Court stressed the importance of following established legal procedures and utilizing available appellate mechanisms before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction, particularly in taxation matters involving specialized Tribunals. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:03:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171442 The High Court of Madhya Pradesh held that a writ petition was not maintainable when a statutory remedy was available to the petitioner through the Central Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Citing a Supreme Court precedent, the court emphasized the need to exhaust statutory remedies before approaching the court directly. The petitioner was directed to challenge the action before the Appellate Tribunal within 30 days. The High Court stressed the importance of following established legal procedures and utilizing available appellate mechanisms before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction, particularly in taxation matters involving specialized Tribunals. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171442