<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 977 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171452</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, upholding the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The penalty under Section 76 was set aside. The appellant was directed to pay a reduced penalty of 25% of the confirmed Service Tax within 30 days. Failure to comply would result in liability for 100% of the Service Tax. The penalty under Section 77 was confirmed, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 12:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 977 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171452</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, upholding the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The penalty under Section 76 was set aside. The appellant was directed to pay a reduced penalty of 25% of the confirmed Service Tax within 30 days. Failure to comply would result in liability for 100% of the Service Tax. The penalty under Section 77 was confirmed, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>