<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 979 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171454</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted the appeal based on substantial questions of law regarding the receipt of goods covered by invoices, the availability of Cenvat credit despite receiving scrap, and the correctness of invoking the extended period of limitation. The Court directed the Registrar to ensure the original record is summoned for inspection and further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:26:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 979 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171454</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted the appeal based on substantial questions of law regarding the receipt of goods covered by invoices, the availability of Cenvat credit despite receiving scrap, and the correctness of invoking the extended period of limitation. The Court directed the Registrar to ensure the original record is summoned for inspection and further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>