<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1479 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171434</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the payment of duty through Cenvat credit without sufficient balance during goods clearance. The Court found no basis to challenge the Tribunal&#039;s decision, as it aligned with a previous judgment from the Gujarat High Court. Additionally, the High Court dismissed the appeal against the CESTAT&#039;s decision to set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order on interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the appellant failed to provide evidence of a contrary ruling by the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1479 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171434</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the payment of duty through Cenvat credit without sufficient balance during goods clearance. The Court found no basis to challenge the Tribunal&#039;s decision, as it aligned with a previous judgment from the Gujarat High Court. Additionally, the High Court dismissed the appeal against the CESTAT&#039;s decision to set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order on interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the appellant failed to provide evidence of a contrary ruling by the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed, and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>