<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 684 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting several additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the identity and genuineness of transactions, criticizing the AO for inadequate inquiries. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine certain disallowances, remanding some issues for further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:16:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 684 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting several additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the identity and genuineness of transactions, criticizing the AO for inadequate inquiries. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine certain disallowances, remanding some issues for further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>