<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 682 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12. It ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the additions were not supported by sufficient evidence and were based on conjectures and surmises, directing the AO to delete the disputed amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 682 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12. It ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the additions were not supported by sufficient evidence and were based on conjectures and surmises, directing the AO to delete the disputed amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>