<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 681 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the payments for satellite rights were for outright sales and not royalties. Consequently, Section 194J was deemed inapplicable, leading to the deletion of the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The alternative argument regarding depreciation was considered irrelevant in light of the primary findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 681 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the payments for satellite rights were for outright sales and not royalties. Consequently, Section 194J was deemed inapplicable, leading to the deletion of the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia). The alternative argument regarding depreciation was considered irrelevant in light of the primary findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>