<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 359 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171425</link>
    <description>A comprehensive town planning statute may create its own scheme for vesting, compensation, reservation and financial adjustment as part of planned urban development, and it is not unconstitutional merely because it differs from the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The absence of a universal appeal, solatium, or the full land acquisition machinery does not by itself amount to discrimination or arbitrariness, provided the statutory scheme is coherent and not illusory. The earlier Constitution Bench view sustaining the Act was reaffirmed and later decisions were read as explaining, not overruling, that position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:17:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 359 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171425</link>
      <description>A comprehensive town planning statute may create its own scheme for vesting, compensation, reservation and financial adjustment as part of planned urban development, and it is not unconstitutional merely because it differs from the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The absence of a universal appeal, solatium, or the full land acquisition machinery does not by itself amount to discrimination or arbitrariness, provided the statutory scheme is coherent and not illusory. The earlier Constitution Bench view sustaining the Act was reaffirmed and later decisions were read as explaining, not overruling, that position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>