<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (11) TMI 155 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171419</link>
    <description>Criminal appeals against conviction do not abate on an appellant&#039;s death where the applicable statutory proviso permits near relatives to continue and leave has been granted; the appeal therefore remained maintainable. Prosecution sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act is valid when granted by the authority competent to remove the public servant from service. For the relevant Class III headquarters post, applicable civil service rules and a saved presidential order identified the Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports as the appointing and disciplinary authority. Later rules did not displace that order absent inconsistency. The conviction consequently remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:10:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (11) TMI 155 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171419</link>
      <description>Criminal appeals against conviction do not abate on an appellant&#039;s death where the applicable statutory proviso permits near relatives to continue and leave has been granted; the appeal therefore remained maintainable. Prosecution sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act is valid when granted by the authority competent to remove the public servant from service. For the relevant Class III headquarters post, applicable civil service rules and a saved presidential order identified the Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports as the appointing and disciplinary authority. Later rules did not displace that order absent inconsistency. The conviction consequently remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>