<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 669 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261708</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit cannot be denied solely on the basis of a broker&#039;s diary and untested third-party statements where the assessee is not allowed cross-examination and the record lacks independent corroboration. The article emphasises that statements used against a noticee ordinarily require an opportunity for cross-examination unless exceptional circumstances exist, and that private diary entries by themselves do not establish liability without reliable supporting evidence. Where there is no independent proof of non-receipt of inputs, alternative procurement, cash flow-back, or clandestine diversion, the demand is not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 669 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261708</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit cannot be denied solely on the basis of a broker&#039;s diary and untested third-party statements where the assessee is not allowed cross-examination and the record lacks independent corroboration. The article emphasises that statements used against a noticee ordinarily require an opportunity for cross-examination unless exceptional circumstances exist, and that private diary entries by themselves do not establish liability without reliable supporting evidence. Where there is no independent proof of non-receipt of inputs, alternative procurement, cash flow-back, or clandestine diversion, the demand is not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>