<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 665 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261704</link>
    <description>Capital goods used to erect a power plant qualified for Modvat Credit under Rule 57Q where the electricity generated was substantially captively consumed in the assessee&#039;s factory for manufacture of final products, with only a small surplus sold outside. The governing principle applied was that inputs or capital goods used to generate electricity captively consumed in manufacturing are used &quot;in relation to manufacture,&quot; supporting credit eligibility. The Revenue&#039;s objection would have had force only if the electricity were not in substance captively consumed. Modvat Credit was therefore admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 665 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261704</link>
      <description>Capital goods used to erect a power plant qualified for Modvat Credit under Rule 57Q where the electricity generated was substantially captively consumed in the assessee&#039;s factory for manufacture of final products, with only a small surplus sold outside. The governing principle applied was that inputs or capital goods used to generate electricity captively consumed in manufacturing are used &quot;in relation to manufacture,&quot; supporting credit eligibility. The Revenue&#039;s objection would have had force only if the electricity were not in substance captively consumed. Modvat Credit was therefore admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>