<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 650 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261689</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to delete the penalty, citing the assessee&#039;s bonafide belief, voluntary disclosure, and lack of deliberate concealment. Emphasizing the absence of intentional wrongdoing, the Tribunal concluded that penalties should not be imposed for inadvertent errors made in good faith. The judgment underscored the importance of conscious efforts to conceal income or provide inaccurate particulars to justify penalty imposition, which was not found in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 650 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261689</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to delete the penalty, citing the assessee&#039;s bonafide belief, voluntary disclosure, and lack of deliberate concealment. Emphasizing the absence of intentional wrongdoing, the Tribunal concluded that penalties should not be imposed for inadvertent errors made in good faith. The judgment underscored the importance of conscious efforts to conceal income or provide inaccurate particulars to justify penalty imposition, which was not found in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>