<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 649 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the public charitable trust exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, ruling that the trust primarily existed for educational purposes, did not collect capitation fees, and was not profit-driven. The Tribunal emphasized that the trust as a whole should be considered for exemption, not individual institutions. Additionally, it found no evidence of a profit motive in the trust&#039;s operations, clarified that donations were not capitation fees, and deemed the minor investment in shares as permissible under Section 13(1)(d). The Tribunal criticized the unfair assessment process and stressed the importance of procedural fairness in allowing the trust to challenge adverse evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 649 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the public charitable trust exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act, ruling that the trust primarily existed for educational purposes, did not collect capitation fees, and was not profit-driven. The Tribunal emphasized that the trust as a whole should be considered for exemption, not individual institutions. Additionally, it found no evidence of a profit motive in the trust&#039;s operations, clarified that donations were not capitation fees, and deemed the minor investment in shares as permissible under Section 13(1)(d). The Tribunal criticized the unfair assessment process and stressed the importance of procedural fairness in allowing the trust to challenge adverse evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>