<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 648 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 16.87 lakhs and reject the demand of Rs. 5,82,920/-. It emphasized the necessity for proper inquiries and satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, ruling that sections 68 and 115BBC were inapplicable. The Tribunal held that since the assessee had provided complete donor details, including PAN, the addition under section 68 was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 648 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 16.87 lakhs and reject the demand of Rs. 5,82,920/-. It emphasized the necessity for proper inquiries and satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, ruling that sections 68 and 115BBC were inapplicable. The Tribunal held that since the assessee had provided complete donor details, including PAN, the addition under section 68 was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>