<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Reviews Alleged Forced Service Tax Recovery; Petitioner Claims Coerced Cheque Issuance and Letter Signing.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23845</link>
    <description>Forced Recovery of service tax - Since the petitioner have stated that the authorized representative was compelled to sign on the said letter and issued two cheques covering the said amount, this Court cannot decide whether the same was taken forcibly or was issued voluntarily. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:20:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:20:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Reviews Alleged Forced Service Tax Recovery; Petitioner Claims Coerced Cheque Issuance and Letter Signing.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23845</link>
      <description>Forced Recovery of service tax - Since the petitioner have stated that the authorized representative was compelled to sign on the said letter and issued two cheques covering the said amount, this Court cannot decide whether the same was taken forcibly or was issued voluntarily. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:20:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=23845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>