<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 677 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171396</link>
    <description>The extended period of limitation was held unavailable to the Department because the Tribunal had already recorded reasons why it could not be invoked, and no error was found in that conclusion. The Court therefore declined to examine any further question and left the Tribunal&#039;s finding undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 10:38:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 677 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171396</link>
      <description>The extended period of limitation was held unavailable to the Department because the Tribunal had already recorded reasons why it could not be invoked, and no error was found in that conclusion. The Court therefore declined to examine any further question and left the Tribunal&#039;s finding undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>