https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261675 The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the legality of the search and seizure conducted on 7th June, 2013. It found that there was "reason to believe" for the search, based on sufficient grounds provided by the respondents. The Court also held that the summons issued during the search were valid and not illegal. Regarding the alleged forcible collection of cheques, the Court determined that it involved disputed questions of fact requiring a full-fledged trial. The Court concluded that the authorities had the authority to collect amounts during the raid, given the petitioner's admission of service tax liability, and therefore, denied the relief sought in the writ petition. en-us Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261675 The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the legality of the search and seizure conducted on 7th June, 2013. It found that there was "reason to believe" for the search, based on sufficient grounds provided by the respondents. The Court also held that the summons issued during the search were valid and not illegal. Regarding the alleged forcible collection of cheques, the Court determined that it involved disputed questions of fact requiring a full-fledged trial. The Court concluded that the authorities had the authority to collect amounts during the raid, given the petitioner's admission of service tax liability, and therefore, denied the relief sought in the writ petition. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261675