https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261673 The tribunal found that the appellant had paid the service tax for the relevant periods. Citing a Kolkata CESTAT judgment, the late fee for the period with NIL service tax liability was waived. For the period with service tax liability, the tribunal reduced the late fee imposed on the appellant in consideration of the service tax paid on time. As a result, the late fee for the period April 2012 to June 2012 was set aside, and the late fee for the period October 2011 to March 2012 was reduced to an appropriate amount. The appeal was allowed partially in favor of the appellant. en-us Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261673 The tribunal found that the appellant had paid the service tax for the relevant periods. Citing a Kolkata CESTAT judgment, the late fee for the period with NIL service tax liability was waived. For the period with service tax liability, the tribunal reduced the late fee imposed on the appellant in consideration of the service tax paid on time. As a result, the late fee for the period April 2012 to June 2012 was set aside, and the late fee for the period October 2011 to March 2012 was reduced to an appropriate amount. The appeal was allowed partially in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261673