<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 633 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a subsidiary company, allowing them to claim Cenvat credit for Service Tax paid on advertising expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that the subsidiary&#039;s entitlement to the credit was not affected by the reimbursement of expenses by the parent company. It held that the subsidiary could claim the credit based on the actual payment of Service Tax, irrespective of internal financial arrangements between related entities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 633 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a subsidiary company, allowing them to claim Cenvat credit for Service Tax paid on advertising expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that the subsidiary&#039;s entitlement to the credit was not affected by the reimbursement of expenses by the parent company. It held that the subsidiary could claim the credit based on the actual payment of Service Tax, irrespective of internal financial arrangements between related entities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>