<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 632 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261671</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied merely because the insurance policy was treated as an improper document where it contained the registration number and service tax component required under Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Input service credit on marine insurance used in export-related business was also admissible, as the relevant test was sufficient nexus with business operations and not confinement to factory premises. The impugned order was set aside, and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 632 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261671</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied merely because the insurance policy was treated as an improper document where it contained the registration number and service tax component required under Rule 9(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Input service credit on marine insurance used in export-related business was also admissible, as the relevant test was sufficient nexus with business operations and not confinement to factory premises. The impugned order was set aside, and the assessee&#039;s appeal succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>