<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 631 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261670</link>
    <description>Drawback on excise duty paid on inputs and refund of Service Tax on cargo handling services were treated as operating in different fields. The tribunal distinguished duty borne on inputs used in manufacture from tax paid on export-related services availed after clearance of goods, and held that the drawback mechanism does not absorb the service tax incidence. Because the service tax related to facilitating export rather than to the exported goods themselves, refund of that tax was allowable while drawback on input duty remained separately available. The refund claim was upheld and the objection to simultaneous relief was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:44:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 631 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261670</link>
      <description>Drawback on excise duty paid on inputs and refund of Service Tax on cargo handling services were treated as operating in different fields. The tribunal distinguished duty borne on inputs used in manufacture from tax paid on export-related services availed after clearance of goods, and held that the drawback mechanism does not absorb the service tax incidence. Because the service tax related to facilitating export rather than to the exported goods themselves, refund of that tax was allowable while drawback on input duty remained separately available. The refund claim was upheld and the objection to simultaneous relief was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>