https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261668 Writ petitions challenging reassessment and demand notices were held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal remedy was available, and the substantive objections were left to the First Appellate Authority. The High Court further held that the applicability of Circular No. 12/2009-10 in a joint development transaction depends on factual characterisation of the transaction and must be examined afresh by the appellate authority. Pending the statutory appeal, respondents were restrained from making fresh demands, the petitioner was given time to file appeals, delay objections were not to be pressed, and the appeals were directed to be decided expeditiously. en-us Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jul 2015 08:44:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261668 Writ petitions challenging reassessment and demand notices were held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal remedy was available, and the substantive objections were left to the First Appellate Authority. The High Court further held that the applicability of Circular No. 12/2009-10 in a joint development transaction depends on factual characterisation of the transaction and must be examined afresh by the appellate authority. Pending the statutory appeal, respondents were restrained from making fresh demands, the petitioner was given time to file appeals, delay objections were not to be pressed, and the appeals were directed to be decided expeditiously. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 01 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261668