<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 619 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261658</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed on the Assessee for concealing income and furnishing inaccurate particulars. It found that the Assessee&#039;s actions did not demonstrate dishonesty or malafide intent, as they were based on a bonafide belief supported by legal precedents. The Court emphasized that the Revenue&#039;s contentions did not raise substantial questions of law, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=390672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 619 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261658</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision to delete the penalty imposed on the Assessee for concealing income and furnishing inaccurate particulars. It found that the Assessee&#039;s actions did not demonstrate dishonesty or malafide intent, as they were based on a bonafide belief supported by legal precedents. The Court emphasized that the Revenue&#039;s contentions did not raise substantial questions of law, ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>